Oliver worked for EvolutionMetrix (formerly Collegiate Baseball Scouting Network) as an amateur talent scout during his sophomore year of college. The mission of the company was to create a database of overlooked college baseball players (primarily Division II and III) from around the country and promote these hidden talents to various MLB teams.
Over the course of the 2018 spring season, he attended ten games of baseball programs in the Nashville area featuring players from Vanderbilt University, Lipscomb University, Belmont University, Trevecca Nazarene University and their various opponents. In total, he collected data for over twenty players and have displayed a few of those scouting reports below.
Below: Josh Martinez – Lipscomb University | Jordan Carr – University of North Carolina, Asheville | Brad Harrison – Southern Illinois University| Jack Riley – University of Massachusetts, Lowell | Kyle Hubbuch – University of Northern Alabama
———————————————
———————————————
Josh Martinez – Lipscomb University
Scout Date: February 18, 2018
Player Name | Josh Martinez |
Class | So |
Scout Name | Oliver Green |
Player School (full name) | Lipscomb University |
Conference | Atlantic Sun |
Height (inches) | 5’ 11” |
Weight | 175 |
Throwing Side (R/L) | L |
Batting Side (R/L/S) | L |
Opponent School | University of North Carolina-Asheville |
Opponent Conference | Big South |
At – bats | 4 |
Walks | 0 |
Hits | 2 |
Runs | 1 |
Stolen Bases | |
RBI | |
Home-1st time (X.X – seconds) | 4.16 |
Number of Swings | 5 |
Swings & Misses | 1 |
Chase Swings | 1 |
Length of At-Bat (pitches) | 3 , 4 , 6, 1 = 3.5 |
Hard Contact – Pull side | 1 |
Hard Contact – Middle | 1 |
Hard Contact – Opposite Field |
Stance/Hit Approach: Compact and balanced stance, stays through the ball. Patient hitter, pounces on strikes, handles off-speed pitches well. Always prepared to swing, but seems to know which pitches his strengths are and are not.
Physical Description: A lot of room left to grow physically, wiry frame but lean body and clear athlete.
ML Comparison: Mallex Smith
Hitting Ability – Present (35), Future (50): stays on pitches and tracks ball well, higher velocities will test bat speed early on
Power – Present (25), Future (35): all depends on how well he fills out physically, however shows ability to drive the ball with some force
Running Speed – Present (50), Future (60): moves very well, fast out of the box
Base Running – Present (30), Future (45): picked off by a lefty with a good move after third consecutive throw over, somewhat over-aggressive
Arm Strength – Present (40), Future (50): steady arm, easy motion
Arm Accuracy – Present (35), Future (45): not much action
Fielding – Present (50), Future (55): good first step after balls, got behind fly balls and around ground balls
Range – Present (50), Future (60): showed ability to get a good jump
Baseball Instincts – Present (40), Future (50): seems to understand the game at a good level
Aggressiveness – Present (60), Future (60): best part of his game, could be reigned in a little, but aggressive approach allows him to attack the pitcher and not the other way around
Summation: Already drafted by Tampa Bay Rays in 39th round of 2016 MLB Draft. Great eye at the play and has an aggressive, yet selective approach that yields success. Currently possesses lean, athletic frame with room left to develop and fill out. Not a serious home run threat right now, but has shown the ability to drive the ball with an easy swing and could add power through physical growth.
———————————————
———————————————
Jordan Carr – University of North Carolina, Asheville
Scout Date: February 18, 2018
Player Name | Jordan Carr |
Class | R-SO |
Scout Name | Oliver Green |
Player School (full name) | University of North Carolina-Asheville |
Conference | Big South |
Height (inches) | 6’ 2” |
Weight | 200 lbs |
Throwing Side (R/L) | L |
Batting Side (R/L/S) | |
Opponent School | Lipscomb University |
Opponent Conference | Atlantic Sun |
Innings Pitched | 5.33 |
Fastball Grade (20 – 80) | 25 |
Fastball Velo Min | 72 |
Fastball Velo Max | 74 |
Breaking Ball Grade (20 – 80) Slider | 30 |
Breaking Ball Velo Min | 58 |
Breaking Ball Velo Max | 62 |
3rd Pitch Grade (20 – 80) Changeup | 25 |
3rd Pitch Velo Min | 64 |
3rd Pitch Velo Max | 66 |
Hits Allowed | 4 |
Runs Allowed | 1 |
Walks | 1 |
193-1Groundouts | 2 |
Flyouts | 6 |
Strike/Ball Ratio (put numerator over 1) | 2.5 : 1 |
Hits Allowed – Left Side | 2 |
Hits Allowed – Middle | 2 |
Hits Allowed – Right Side | 1 |
Swings & Misses – Fastball | 3 |
Swings & Misses – Breaking Ball | 2 |
Swings & Misses – 3rd Pitch | 1 |
Total Swings – Fastball | 19 |
Total Swings – Breaking Ball | 6 |
Total Swings – 3rd Pitch | 4 |
Chase Swings – Fastball | 1 |
Chase Swings – Breaking Ball | 4 |
Chase Swings – 3rd Pitch | 1 |
Hard Contact – Fastball | 3 |
Hard Contact – Breaking Ball | 0 |
Hard Contact – 3rd Pitch | 1 |
Arm/Delivery Mechanics: easily repeated delivery, does not generate enough velocity however
Physical Description: tall with a good frame and room to grow, broad shoulders
ML Comparison: Matt Moore
Fastball (velo: 72-74 mph) – Present (25), Future (35): makes up for lack of velocity with good control, very confident throwing it
FB Movement – Present (40), Future (45): drew many swing and misses off of his FB, including four strikeouts
Curve (velo: 58-64 mph) – Present (30), Future (35): mixed bag of effective CBs and some hangers, overall decent pitch that can draw outs
Change (velo: 64 – 66 mph) – Present (40), Future (50): confident 3rd pitch, threw it multiple times with full count for strikes
Control: – Present (50), Future (55): good command, seems locked in on every pitch
Poise: – Present (65), Future (65): unfazed with runners on base, good rapport with catcher
Aggressiveness: – Present (60), Future (70): attacked early, getting many first pitch strikes, didn’t back down when falling behind in count either
Summation: Good size and room to fill out the rest of his body. While his fastball certainly won’t light up a radar gun, he combines his control, aggressiveness and baseball IQ to get ahead of batters and get quick outs. A sharper curveball would allow him to diversify his pitches more as he is somewhat fastball-heavy, however he knows what he’s doing on the mound and communicates well with his catcher. Changeup is developing nicely into a reliable secondary and is able to slow it down enough to get hitters off balance. Strong pickoff move keeps runners honest at first – seems mature commanding the mound.
———————————————
———————————————
Brad Harrison – Southern Illinois University
Scout Date – February 27, 2018
Player Name | Brad Harrison |
Class | So. |
Scout Name | Oliver Green |
Player School (full name) | Southern Illinois University |
Conference | Missouri Valley |
Height (inches) | 76 |
Weight | 210 |
Throwing Side (R/L) | L |
Batting Side (R/L/S) | |
Opponent School | Belmont University |
Opponent Conference | Ohio Valley |
Innings Pitched | 6 |
Fastball Grade (20 – 80) | 35 |
Fastball Velo Min | 74 |
Fastball Velo Max | 78 |
Breaking Ball Grade (20 – 80) Slider | 50 |
Breaking Ball Velo Min | 63 |
Breaking Ball Velo Max | 67 |
3rd Pitch Grade (20 – 80) Changeup | 25 |
3rd Pitch Velo Min | 70 |
3rd Pitch Velo Max | 72 |
Hits Allowed | 2 |
Runs Allowed | 0 |
Walks | 1 |
Groundouts | 10 |
Flyouts | 8 |
Strike/Ball Ratio (put numerator over 1) | 2.4 : 1 |
Hits Allowed – Left Side | 2 |
Hits Allowed – Middle | |
Hits Allowed – Right Side | |
Swings & Misses – Fastball | 3 |
Swings & Misses – Breaking Ball | 9 |
Swings & Misses – 3rd Pitch | 1 |
Total Swings – Fastball | 24 |
Total Swings – Breaking Ball | 16 |
Total Swings – 3rd Pitch | 3 |
Chase Swings – Fastball | 1 |
Chase Swings – Breaking Ball | 7 |
Chase Swings – 3rd Pitch | 1 |
Hard Contact – Fastball | 2 |
Hard Contact – Breaking Ball | 0 |
Hard Contact – 3rd Pitch | 0 |
Arm/Delivery Mechanics: methodical, easily-repeated delivery. Gets to same spot with front knee on each wind-up and maintains sam Transfers weight well using a steady, balanced lower half.
Physical Description: tall, imposing build. Still young with room to grow and fill in. Already possesses good lower body strength. Slanted shoulders. Big hands, easily manipulates the ball.
ML Comparison: Drew Pomeranz
Fastball (velo: 74-78 mph) – Present (30), Future (45): threw fastball for many first-pitch strikes. Ball jumps off hand, uses over-the-top delivery
FB Movement – Present (30), Future (45): some slight cut movement, but fastball strength is in location
Curve (velo: 63-67 mph) – Present (40), Future (50): great 12-6 movement with late break, produces many swing and misses. Threw for first pitch for strikes
Change (velo: 70 – 72 mph) – Present (25), Future (35): developing third pitch. Did not throw much, but was effective following his fastball. Will require a greater change from his fastball to be viable against better competition
Control: – Present (45), Future (55): excellent command of all pitches, many first pitch strikes and never seemed to fall behind in the count
Poise: – Present (50), Future (60): pitched with a quick rhythm, no pause in between pitches, focused and ready to attack on every delivery
Aggressiveness: – Present (50), Future (65): confident in his stuff, attacked hitters with first pitch strikes and switched between fastball and off-speed pitches effectively
Summation: Big balance left. Methodical and repeated delivery. Clears body well and all parts of motion appear to move in sync. Establish approach forcing pitchers to swing at first pitch fastballs or look at well-located curveballs for strikes. Usually ahead in count early. Dominates the mound with his size and over-the-top motion – physically imposing. Hides ball behind his head and has batter to read ball out of hand.
———————————————
———————————————
Jack Riley – University of Massachusetts, Lowell
Scout Date: February 24, 2018
Player Name | Jack Riley |
Class | R-Jr. |
Scout Name | Oliver Green |
Player School (full name) | University of Massachusetts-Lowell |
Conference | American East |
Height (inches) | 74 |
Weight | 192 |
Throwing Side (R/L) | L |
Batting Side (R/L/S) | |
Opponent School | Vanderbilt University |
Opponent Conference | South Eastern |
Innings Pitched | 4.33 |
Fastball Grade (20 – 80) | 25 |
Fastball Velo Min | 80 |
Fastball Velo Max | 84 |
Breaking Ball Grade (20 – 80) Slider | 40 |
Breaking Ball Velo Min | 67 |
Breaking Ball Velo Max | 73 |
3rd Pitch Grade (20 – 80) Changeup | 30 |
3rd Pitch Velo Min | 75 |
3rd Pitch Velo Max | 76 |
Hits Allowed | 7 |
Runs Allowed | 5 |
Walks | 3 |
Groundouts | 2 |
Flyouts | 0 |
Strike/Ball Ratio (put numerator over 1) | 3 : 1 |
Hits Allowed – Left Side | 5 |
Hits Allowed – Middle | 2 |
Hits Allowed – Right Side | 0 |
Swings & Misses – Fastball | 2 |
Swings & Misses – Breaking Ball | 10 |
Swings & Misses – 3rd Pitch | 7 |
Total Swings – Fastball | 11 |
Total Swings – Breaking Ball | 30 |
Total Swings – 3rd Pitch | 12 |
Chase Swings – Fastball | 2 |
Chase Swings – Breaking Ball | 10 |
Chase Swings – 3rd Pitch | 4 |
Hard Contact – Fastball | 3 |
Hard Contact – Breaking Ball | 3 |
Hard Contact – 3rd Pitch | 0 |
Arm/Delivery Mechanics: delivery is very disjointed with a lot of moving parts, however he is able to repeat it and make it work. Takes the ball very far behind his body during windup making it difficult for the batter to pick up early
Physical Description: lean build, good pitching frame; likely fully developed as a redshirt junior
ML Comparison: Rick Porcello
Fastball (velo: 80-84 mph) – Present (25), Future (25): not much confidence with pitch, but used effectively to keep hitters off balance
FB Movement – Present (20), Future (25): very flat, batters expecting fastball connected well often
Curve (velo: 68-72 mph) – Present (40), Future (45): very good curve, easily best pitch, delivery helps conceal it out of his hand; good late break
Change (velo: 75 – 76 mph) – Present (30), Future (35): deceptive pitch, looks like his fastball out of hand, nice late fade to throwing side
Control: – Present (35), Future (40): does not locate fastball well, but throws curveball around edges of the zone for strikes. Controlled waned towards end of appearance with heightened pitch count
Poise: – Present (45), Future (55): pitched out of some tough jams early in game (1st and 3rd no outs, man on 3rd 1 out), showed a lot of competitive energy after adversity
Aggressiveness: – Present (50), Future (50): threw many first pitch curveballs in the zone, loves the pitch and throws it in any count for strikes. Less aggressive with his fastball
Summation: Pitched with a lot of energy and worked his way out of difficult situations. His fastball does not have enough bite nor velocity to rely on, but mixed his pitches well and is able to add some perceived velocity by hiding his arm behind his body in his delivery. His curveball is good and fools many batters, but it was easy to see batters picking it up better the third time around the lineup. One concern is his arm action because of the already funky motion combined with his volume of curveballs thrown. However, despite its flaws, his windup is repeatable and he works with good tempo. Changeup will benefit if he is able to improve fastball movement, but as it stands is a decent third pitch. Interesting player with some caution flags, but possesses baseball knowledge to adapt and could find some success.
———————————————
———————————————
Kyle Hubbuch – University of Northern Alabama
Scout Date – February 20, 2018
Player Name | Kyle Hubbuch |
Class | Senior |
Scout Name | Oliver Green |
Player School (full name) | University of Northern Alabama |
Conference | Gulf South |
Height (inches) | 73 |
Weight | 230 |
Throwing Side (R/L) | R |
Batting Side (R/L/S) | L |
Opponent School | Trevecca Nazarene |
Opponent Conference | Great Midwest Athletic |
At – bats | 5 |
Walks | |
Hits | 2 |
Runs | 1 |
Stolen Bases | |
RBI | 2 |
Home-1st time (X.X – seconds) | |
Number of Swings | 8 |
Swings & Misses | 4 |
Chase Swings | 2 |
Length of At-Bat (pitches) | 6 |
Hard Contact – Pull side | 1 |
Hard Contact – Middle | |
Hard Contact – Opposite Field | 1 |
BP Home Runs – Pull side | |
BP Home Runs – Middle | 1 |
BP Home Runs – Opposite Field | 1 |
Stance/Hit Approach: covers entire plate and is not afraid to swing, takes very aggressive hacks and drives the ball with ease
Physical Description: big bulky, first baseman with powerful lower half, athletic build
ML Comparison: Logan Morrison
Hitting Ability – Present (40), Future (50): good hitter, but aggressive swing makes for boom-or-bust type contact
Power – Present (55), Future (65): ball jumps off of bat, power to all fields, hit 1st inning HR over large left-center wall
Running Speed – Present (25), Future (30): long strides, but does not move great
Base Running – Present (30), Future (30): N/A
Arm Strength – Present (45), Future (45): nothing special, snaps ball off in “around-the-horns”
Arm Accuracy – Present (40), Future (40): not much action
Fielding – Present (40), Future (50): wasn’t tested, however looked capable in warmups
Range – Present (30), Future (35): N/A
Baseball Instincts – Present (45), Future (55): has good approach at the plate, stays back on off-speed and looks to drive the other way
Aggressiveness – Present (45), Future (50): good aggressiveness at plate, however needs to be reigned in somewhat, swung at some pitches that were clearly out of the zone
Summation: Crowds plate and attacks pitches in the strike zone without hesitation. Aggressiveness leads to some swing and misses, but drives the ball when he connects. He is likely done with the majority of his growth, however his physical profile translates to real power already as he has shown an ability to hit the ball with authority to all fields. Has tools to find success at next level, improved pitch recognition against better pitching will be crucial in reducing swing and misses.